NOEL D. CLARK, JR., AND BETSY L. BRENNAN, APPELLANTS,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• In re Forfeiture OF: $221 v. City of Tampa, 106 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
  …y owner] could incur are monetary, and since the statute specifically authorizes monetary relief if she is ultimately successful, it seems to us that the automatic stay rule must apply to civil forfeitures.” Id.-, cf. Tampa Sports Auth. v. Johnston, 914 So. 2d 1076, 1082 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (“As the Gervais court observed, if the city lost the appeal Florida’s forfeiture law would require it to pay Gervais for the lost value of her property and the lost income she suffered as a result of being deprived of her p…
• Fla. Dep't of Health Celeste Philip, M.D. v. People United for Medical Marijuana Florida for Care, 250 So. 3d 825 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
  …4 Pringle, 707 So. 2d 387, 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (quoting St. Lucie Cty.). A party moving to vacate an automatic stay must demonstrate that “the equities are overwhelming tilted against maintaining the stay.” Tampa Sports Auth. v. Johnston, 914 So. 2d 1076, 1084 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Last, in determining whether to vacate an automatic stay, the trial court must consider (1) the government’s likelihood of success on appeal, and (2) the likelihood of irreparable harm if the automatic stay is reinstated…