MARCUS D. SIGLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARCUS D. SIGLER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
915 So. 2d 687
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Marcus Sigler appeals, challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We lack jurisdiction to review this matter because no final, appealable order was entered by the trial court. In that regard, instead of filing a written order denying Mr. Sigler’s motion, the trial court merely signed the court minutes sheet. Court minutes, even when signed by the trial judge, do not constitute appealable orders. State v. Wagner, 863 So. 2d 1224 (Fla.2004). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal with directions that the trial court render an appropriate order. APPEAL DISMISSED.
SAWAYA, PALMER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't OF Child. & Families v. E.G., 939 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…to pay for an interpreter, had been signed by the trial judge, and had been filed with the clerk, the form did not constitute a reviewable order because the document was a “court minutes” form. This approach was later reinforced in Sigler v. State, 915 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). In that case, the trial court utilized a form entitled, “court minutes/order (evidentiary hearing)” to issue a ruling denying a defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed under rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Crimina…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Wagner, 863 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2004)