JAMES HOLLIS HYERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES HOLLIS HYERS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
915 So. 2d 711
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Geoghegan v. Geoghegan, 969 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)…e trial court’s alimony determination, it is incumbent upon the trial court to include specific findings of fact regarding the factors enumerated in section 61.08(2)(a)-(g). Williams v. Williams, 923 So. 2d 606, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Jain v. Jain, 915 So. 2d 711, 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Milo v. Milo, 718 So. 2d 343, 344 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Brooks v. Brooks, 678 So. 2d 1368, 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The failure to provide these required findings may, therefore, constitute reversible error. Fulmer v. Fulmer…
-
T.J.D. v. A.G., 39 So. 3d 360 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…discretion in deviating substantially from the guidelines. There are no factual findings to explain the trial court’s reasoning in determining the amount to depart. This lack of findings hampers meaningful appellate review. See, e.g., Jain v. Jain, 915 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (reversing and remanding for the court to redetermine the former wife’s income and recalculate child support when the court failed to explain how the parties’ net incomes were derived); Ondrejack, 839 So. 2d at 872 (“While we giv…
Authorities Cited
- Barnes v. Sanders, 907 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)