UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
NELSON RICARDO, APPELLEE
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
NELSON RICARDO, APPELLEE
916 So. 2d 44
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
On the record before us, we cannot conclude that the lower court abused its discretion when it awarded the appellee a 2.0 multiplier on an attorney’s fee award in the instant action for a determination of coverage under a policy issued by the appellant insurer. See Holiday v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Ins., 864 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Padron, 775 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Blackmon v. State, 121 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 2013)…te, 93 So. 3d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“As the record reflects that both charges for dealing in stolen property and grand theft relate to one scheme or course of conduct, we reverse the judgment and sentence for grand theft.”); Corvo v. State, 916 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Jones v. State, 453 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). This Case Section 812.025 and Hall clearly provide that a jury may not return guilty verdicts on both dealing in stolen property and theft when both offenses were committed “i…
-
Anderson v. State, 2 So. 3d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…in stolen property under those facts. In this case appellant did not raise section 812.025 in the trial court; however, his adjudication of guilt and sentences can be raised for the first time on appeal as fundamental error. Toson; Corvo v. State, 916 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Appellant argues that we should direct the trial court to vacate his conviction for dealing in stolen property, which carried a fifteen year sentence, rather than his third degree conviction and five year sentence for grand thef…1 / 2
-
Eli Enrique Valdes v. State, 970 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…violation constitutes fundamental error, see State v. Johnson, 483 So. 2d 420, 421 (Fla.1986), and a claim of fundamental error may be raised for the first time on direct appeal. See Sanford v. Rubin, 237 So. 2d 134, 137 (Fla.1970); Corvo v. State, 916 So. 2d 44, 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Barfield v. State, 871 So. 2d 929, 930-31 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). We, therefore, address the merits of the defendant’s claim. The defendant claims that his convictions for shooting from a vehicle in violation of section 790.15(…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Holiday v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins., 864 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
- Noel v. State, 864 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
- Wallace v. State, 775 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
- United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Benita E. Padron, 775 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)