LEONARD LONG, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBIN LONG, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2005-06-08
No. 2D04-1288
DAVIS and CANADY, JJ., Concur.
916 So. 2d 823 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases


Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.

KELLY, Judge.

Leonard Long (the husband) appeals from the order requiring him to pay temporary child support. He argues that the trial court erred in proceeding with the temporary support hearing and determining his support obligations without sufficient evidence of the parties’ current financial status and without a child support guidelines worksheet. We agree and reverse.

We direct that on remand the trial court determine the parties’ current financial situation and recalculate their child support obligations on a worksheet using current financial information and applying the child support guidelines. See Durham v. Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Durham, 850 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (holding that it was error for the trial court to decide the issue of child support without a child support guidelines worksheet). We also note that the income deduction order must direct payments to Pinellas County, rather than to Hillsborough County, as was previously done in this case. Based on our holding, we need not address the husband’s remaining arguments on appeal.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

DAVIS and CANADY, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lennon v. Simone Lennon, 264 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
  • Dep't OF Revenue v. Moneyham, 931 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
    …ation). On remand, the ALJ is ordered “to determine the parties’ current financial situation and recalculate their child support obligations on a worksheet using current financial information and applying the child support guidelines.” Long v. Long, 916 So. 2d 823, 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. KAHN, C.J.; ERVIN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.…
  • Sullavin McKENZIE v. Dep't OF Revenue, 981 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
    …ubstantial evidence to support the trial court’s order requiring appellant to pay child support. The State concedes that the child support guidelines worksheet is not contained in the record and, accordingly, reversal is warranted. See Long v. Long, 916 So. 2d 823, 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (holding that it was error for the trial court to determine the issue of child support without a child support guidelines [*1290] worksheet). We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing, which shall include a determinati…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw