JOSE A. RIVERA, APPELLANT,
v.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND GALLAGHER BASSETT INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a Judge of Compensation Claims' failure to rule on a fully tried issue constitutes reversible error, and the absence of a ruling is not a denial for jurisdictional purposes.
Appellant sought attorney's fees from employer/carrier. The Judge of Compensation Claims denied fees under one statutory subsection but failed to rule…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attorney'S Fees In Workers' Compensation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (“JCC”) denial of his motion requesting employer/carrier’s payment of his attorney’s fees, pursuant to sections 440.34(3)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (1993). We affirm the JCC’s denial of appellant’s petition for attorney’s fees under section 440.34(3)(a) without further comment.
However, because the JCC failed to rule on whether claimant is entitled to attorney’s fees under section dJORJ^Xb),1 we reverse. We have ruled that:
In cases in which the JCC fails to enter a ruling on a fully tried issue that is ripe for adjudication and does not reserve jurisdiction on the issue, this court will consider the absence of a ruling to constitute a denial of the claim only for jurisdictional purposes, and the order will, therefore, be deemed final and appealable. As to the merits in such cases, this court will continue to consider the JCC’s failure to rule reversible error based on the JCC’s noncompliance with the duty to adjudicate all issues that are ripe for adjudication.
Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 693 So. 2d 680, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (en banc); see also City of West Palm Beach Fire Dep’t v. Norman, 711 So. 2d 628, 630 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We remand to the JCC for a determination of appellant’s entitlement to attorney’s fees under section 440.34(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1993).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED with directions.
ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur. . Section 440.34(3)(b) allows a claimant to recover attorney's fees from the employer/carrier ''[i]n any case in which the employer or carrier fails or refuses to pay a claim filed with the division which meets the require-merits of s. 440.19(l)(e) on or before the 21st day after receiving notice of the claim, and the injured person has employed an attorney in the successful prosecution of his claim.''
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co. & Kemper Ins. Co., 693 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- Caracciolo v. State, 711 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- City OF W. Palm Beach Fire Dept. & Johns E. v. Ernie Norman, 711 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)