ANTONIO DOLL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANTONIO DOLL, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
917 So. 2d 881
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. State v. Callaway, 658 So. 2d 983, 987 (Fla.1995)(permitting retro-active application of Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993), which held that the habitual offender statute did not authorize the imposition of consecutive habitual felony offender sentences for multiple crimes committed during a single criminal episode), receded, from in part, Dixon v. State 730 So. 2d 265, 269 n. 7 (Fla.1999)(finding that “defendants must have already filed their 3.850 motion seeking Hale relief, at the very latest, within two years of the date our mandate in Callaway issued on August 16,1995”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Doll v. State, 223 So. 3d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…D15-2515. See Doll v. State, 207 So. 3d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (table). Doll also claims that he was improperly designated a habitual violent felony offender. This court rejected this very claim in appellate case number 3D04-1854. See Doll v. State, 917 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). We deny the instant petition. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Doll is hereby directed to show cause, within forty-five days from the date of this opinion, why he should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se appeals, petitions, m…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993)
- State v. Callaway, 658 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 1995)
- Dixon v. State, 730 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 1999)