STEVEN WIGDOR, APPELLANT,
v.
MARK WIGDOR, APPELLEE
STEVEN WIGDOR, APPELLANT,
MARK WIGDOR, APPELLEE
917 So. 2d 898
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Steven Wigdor appeals an interlocutory order which preserves the status quo of the assets and books and records of a business operated by him and his brother, Mark Wigdor. As we view this order as a temporary injunction, we remand the case to the trial court for the setting of an appropriate injunction bond pursuant to Rule 1.610(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
Affirmed as modified, and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Miami Beach v. Kuoni Destination Mgmt., Inc., 81 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…610. For this reason too, the injunction order must be reversed. See SoBeach Rentals, Inc. v. Shelbome Ocean Beach Hotel, 37 So. 3d 982, 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (injunction bond is required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610); Wigdor v. Wigdor, 917 So. 2d 898, 898 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (same). For these reasons, I would reverse the trial court’s entry of an injunction in this case.…
-
Fleming v. State, 12 So. 3d 307 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 775.082(9)(a)l.p., Fla. Stat. (1999); see also Eubanks v. State, 917 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). GROSS, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.…