L.G., FATHER OF O.G., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2006-01-05
No. 1D05-1702
KAHN, C.J., ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
917 So. 2d 1013 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order denying a motion for relief in connection with the termination of his parental rights. The ruling on that motion is rendered moot by the opinion in L.G. v. Department of Children and Families, case no. 1D04-2238. 917 So. 2d 1015, 2006 WL 20436 (Fla. 1st DCA Jan. 5, 2006). However, in separate orders the trial court also required payment of certain fees, and directed that a lien be placed on the appellant’s funds under section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes. Because the specified fees may not be charged in this type of proceeding, see section 39.0133, Florida Statutes, those orders are reversed.

KAHN, C.J., ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Mallett, 7 So. 3d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
    …arded for the debris removal coverage as well as for coverage under the law and ordinance provision must be affirmed. [*556] At the summary judgment stage, a trial court is to enter a judgment only when no issues of fact remain. See Cohen v. Vining, 917 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). The standard of review regarding the grant of final summary judgment is de novo. Fayad v. Clarendon Nat’l Ins. Co., 899 So. 2d 1082 (Fla.2005). Here, because the record before us does not exclusively establish that the debris re…
  • Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Manning, 966 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
    …shift to Citizens. On motion for summary judgment, “if the record raises the slightest doubt that material issues could be present, that doubt must be resolved against the movant and the motion for summary judgment must be denied.” Cohen v. Vining, 917 So. 2d 1013, 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (quoting Jones v. Directors Guild of Am., Inc., 584 So. 2d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)). Because the Mannings failed to make a prima facie showing of coverage under the windstorm policy as construed in conformity with Fl…
  • Ameril Corp. v. NEW York Reg'l Rail Corp., 943 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
    …resent, that doubt must be resolved against the movant and the motion for summary judgment must be denied.” Jones v. Directors Guild of Am., Inc., 584 So. 2d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (citations omitted). Norman S. Cohen, M.D., P.A. v. Vining, 917 So. 2d 1013, 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); see also Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638, 643 (Fla. 1999)(“It is a well-settled principle of Florida jurisprudence that summary judgment should not be granted unless the facts are so clear and un…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw