MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, PETITIONER(S)

v.

JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., ETC., RESPONDENT(S)

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• In re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar-Advertising, 971 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 2007)
  …INHERENTLY MISLEADING. MOREOVER, THESE “EXPERT” AMENDMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN PROPERLY DEBATED. Sellers of goods and services use commercial advertising to increase sales and to make a name for themselves in the applicable market. See Fla. Bar v. Pape, 918 So. 2d 240, 247 (Fla.2005). The consuming public thus becomes their, target audience, and “the extension of First Amendment protection to commercial speech is justified principally by the value to consumers of the information such speech provides.” Zauderer v.…
• THE Florida BAR v. Hines, 39 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. 2010)
  …s recommendations that Hines be found not guilty of violating rules 4 — 1.1, 4 — 5.8(b) and (c), and 4-8.4(a) and (d).2 Given the stipulated material facts, our review of the referee’s recommendations in this regard is de novo. See Fla. Bar v. Pape, 918 So. 2d 240, 243 (Fla.2005) (stating that where there are no genuine issues of material fact and the only disagreement is whether the undisputed facts constitute unethical conduct, the referee’s findings present a question of law that the Court reviews de novo)…
• THE Florida BAR v. Gold, 937 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 2006)
  …the content of a lawyer’s advertisement being used years after the articles were published. This Court has previously concluded there is no broad constitutional prohibition against the regulation of lawyer advertising. See, e.g., Fla. Bar v. Pape, 918 So. 2d 240 (Fla.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 1632, 164 L.Ed.2d 335 (2006). Further, in 2000, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reaffirmed the well-established principle that a state may ban false, deceptive, or misleading…

Authorities Cited

• Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (U.S. 2004)
• Chandler v. Crosby, 916 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 2005)