THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC., PETITIONER,
v.
DON R. MORGAN, ETC., RESPONDENT
THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC., PETITIONER,
DON R. MORGAN, ETC., RESPONDENT
918 So. 2d 273
Florida Supreme Court (2005)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review District Board of Trustees v. Morgan, 890 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), a decision by the Fifth District Court of Appeal certifying conflict with the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in O’Kon & Co. v. Riedel, 588 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that Morgan and O’Kon & Co. are factually distinct so that the decisions are not in conflict and may live side-by-side in the law of Florida. We therefore exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Sachs v. In re the Est. OF Tina Z. Wolf, 588 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
- The Dist. Bd. OF Trs. v. Morgan, 890 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)