WILLIE LAWRENCE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A conviction based on a statute later declared facially unconstitutional is fundamental error and warrants vacating the conviction.
Willie Lawrence was convicted of racketeering and Medicaid fraud based on a statute that was subsequently declared facially unconstitutional. He appea…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Medicaid Fraud cases and more on FLexlaw
RAMIREZ, J.
Willie Lawrence appeals from an order revoking probation and accompanying sentence for racketeering, with the predicate activity being a violation of the Medicaid fraud statute, section 409.920(2)(e), Florida Statutes. He was also charged with two substantive counts of Medicaid fraud, again in violation of section 409.920(2)(e). We reverse because, subsequent to Lawrence’s sentence, this Court found the Medicaid fraud statute to be facially un constitutional. See State v. Harden, 873 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), appeal docketed, No. SC04-613 (Fla. April 4, 2004).
“[A]n unconstitutional statute is deemed void from the time of its enactment.” Bell v. State, 585 So. 2d 1125, 1127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Further, application of a facially unconstitutional statute is fundamental error which may be raised at any time. Id. at 1126-27; Trushin v. State, 425 So. 2d 1126, 1129-30 (Fla.1983); Williams v. State, 651 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Heflin v. State, 595 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
In Williams, like here, the defendant pled guilty to violating a statute that was later declared unconstitutionally void. He filed a motion to correct illegal sentence, and the appellate court stated that, because the statute was unconstitutional, Williams’ conviction constituted fundamental error and should be vacated. Williams, 651 So. 2d at 1291. Lawrence is entitled to the same relief.
Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge the Defendant from the convictions in Miami-Dade Circuit Court case number 00-24311.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Lawrence, 948 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 2007)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Lawrence v. State, 918 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), in which the Third District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s order revoking probation based upon its prior decision in State v. Harden, 873 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), aff'd, 938 So. 2d 480 (Fla.2006). At the time th…
Authorities Cited
- Trushin v. State, 425 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 1982)
- State v. Harden, 873 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
- Barton v. State, 585 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- Bell v. State, 595 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
- Heflin v. State, 595 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
- Williams v. State, 651 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)