JOHNNY LEE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A sentence that fails to comport with statutory limitations is illegal and can be challenged at any time. The trial court erred in denying the motion to correct the sentence.
Williams was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender to a life term with no minimum. He argued this was illegal…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Habitual Violent Felony Offender cases and more on FLexlaw
ORFINGER, J.
Johnny Lee Williams appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Williams was convicted, inter alia, of armed robbery with a weapon,1 a first degree felony punishable by life.2 Williams was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender to “the minimum term of life [to] be served prior to release.” Williams contends that the trial court erroneously imposed a minimum life term rather than a life term with a fifteen-year minimum. The State concedes error. Section 775.084(4)(b)(l), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that a defendant sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender for a life felony or a felony of the first degree is subject to a life sentence with a minimum mandatory sentence of fifteen years. In denying this claim, the trial court reasoned that the issues could or should have been raised on direct appeal. While that may be true, a sentence that fails to comport with statutory limitations is by definition “illegal” and can be challenged at any time in a rule 3.800(a) proceeding. State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429 (Fla.1998).
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Williams relief on this claim, but affirm the remainder of the order denying relief on the other claims asserted by Williams.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
PLEUS, C.J. and TORPY, J., concur. . § 812.13(1) & (2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000).
. First degree felonies are punishable by a term of years not exceeding life or subject to enhanced sentencing under the habitual felony offender statute. See Burdick v. State, 594 So. 2d 267 (Fla.1992); Burke v. State, 823 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1998)
- Burdick v. State, 594 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1992)
- Jack Banks v. Long, 823 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)