CARLOS J. LUCIANO, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Citrus Cnty. v. Halls River Dev., Inc., 8 So. 3d 413 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)
  …hat the property owner is permanently unable to attain the reasonable investment-backed expectations for the existing use (or vested right) of the property as a whole. § 70.001(3)(e), Fla. Stat. (2005); Palm Beach Polo Inc. v. Village of Wellington, 918 So. 2d 988, 995 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). A Harris Act claim must be presented within one year from the time the law or regulation is first applied by the governmental entity to the property at issue. § 70.001(11), Fla. Stat. (2005). At least 180 days before filin…
• M & H Profit, Inc. v. City OF Panama City, 28 So. 3d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
  …file any type of site plan, building permit application or variance request, M & H’s intended property use could be challenged as speculative, which the statute specifically excludes from protection. See Palm Beach Polo, Inc. v. Vill. of Wellington, 918 So. 2d 988, 995 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (finding that a property owner could not show a “reasonable investment-backed expectation” for an existing use). In addition, the City’s Comprehensive Plan prevails over conflicting zoning regulations. See Halls River, 8 So.…
• Ocean Concrete, Inc. v. Indian River Cnty., 241 So. 3d 181 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)

Authorities Cited

• Smalls v. State, 858 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)