E.T.A., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A special condition of probation prohibiting participation in school extracurricular sports or recreational activities is valid if it bears a reasonable relationship to the crime committed or addresses conduct related to future criminality.
[1] A special condition of probation must bear a reasonable relationship to the crime committed or address conduct reasonably related to future criminality to be valid.
[2] A juvenile's participation in school extracurricular activities can be prohibited as a special condition of probation if it bears a reasonable relationship to the juvenil…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA juvenile was adjudicated delinquent for battery on two students and placed on probation. A special condition prohibited participation in school extr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Special Conditions Of Probation cases and more on FLexlaw
LAWSON, J.
E.T.A., a juvenile, appeals challenging a special condition of probation that prohibits him from participating in school extracurricular sports or recreational activities. Finding that the condition bears a reasonable relationship to E.T.A.’s criminal acts, we affirm.
E.T.A. was placed on probation after being adjudicated delinquent on two counts of battery involving two separate students. The record before the trial court also shows that E.T.A. had been previously suspended from school for fighting and for talking back to teachers. Although the trial court imposed a number of probationary special conditions, E.T.A. only challenges the condition barring his participation in school extracurricular sports or recreational activities. With respect to this condition, the trial court explained that it did not want E.T.A. acting as a role model at school when his violence toward other students rendered him a “bad example.” The judge told E.T.A. that he could play sports again “when he becomes a good example.”
While we may agree that it would constitute poor public policy to allow students adjudicated of criminal acts to be held up as sports role models in our public schools, general school policy is a matter within the purview of our legislature, local school boards, and school administrators. Therefore, this public policy concern, alone, cannot justify the imposition of a special condition of probation. Rather, to be valid, a special condition of probation must either bear a reasonable relationship to the crime committed or address conduct reasonably related to future criminality. Trent v. State, 770 So. 2d 1272, 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Given that E.T.A.’s delinquent acts involve violence against other students, along with his apparent history of other violence at school, we find that a special condition of probation that excludes E.T.A. from non-essential school activities is rationally related to the acts for which he was placed on probation.
For this reason, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.