DANIEL CURTIS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
DANIEL CURTIS, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
920 So. 2d 131
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See McAllister v. State, 821 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Seabrooks [*132] v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).
BARFIELD, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Burkett v. Burkett, 155 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…cript, we cannot know what evidence the court heard beyond the documents that were filed in the record, and we cannot know what issues were preserved for review. See id.; Rose v. Clements, 973 So. 2d 529, 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Hoffman v. Hoffman, 920 So. 2d 131, 131 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). AFFIRMED. ROBERTS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Miller Seabrooks v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- Cooper v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
- McALLISTER v. State, 821 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)