STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLEE
920 So. 2d 624
Florida Supreme Court (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
WELLS, J.
We have on appeal a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal declaring invalid a state statute. Rodriguez v. State, 906 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Rodriguez also expressly and directly conflicts with the decision in Sult v. State, 839 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (3), Fla. Const. For the reasons stated in our opinion in Suit v. State, 906 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 2005), we affirm the decision of the Third District in Rodriguez.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and ANSTEAD, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ„ concur. CANTERO and BELL, JJ., dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Burrough v. State, 943 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Moore v. State, 701 So. 2d 545, 548-49 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct. 1536, 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998); Rodriguez v. State, 906 So. 2d 1082, 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), affirmed, 920 So. 2d 624 (Fla.2005); Jean v. State, 789 So. 2d 550, 550-51 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Slocum v. State, 757 So. 2d 1246, 1250-51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), cause dismissed, 814 [*1026] So. 2d 441 (Fla.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 924, 123 S.Ct. 316, 154 L.Ed.2d 214 (2002…
Authorities Cited
- Sult v. State, 906 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 2005)
- Rodriguez v. State, 906 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
- Camilo v. State, 839 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Sult v. State, 839 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)