RHONDA STRINGFELLOW, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE
RHONDA STRINGFELLOW, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE
920 So. 2d 723
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by claimant Rhonda Stringfellow from a final order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission disqualifying her from unemployment compensation benefits on the ground of misconduct connected with work, i.e., a violation of the employer’s policies. Because there is no showing in the record that claimant repeatedly violated explicit policies after several warnings, the order is REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED with directions for benefits to be awarded during the applicable period. See Ash v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 872 So. 2d 400, 402 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Thomas v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 864 So. 2d 567, 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
ERVIN, BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Meyerowitz v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Al Hendrickson Toyota, Inc., 9 So. 3d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…e of poor judgment may be a sufficient reason for an employer to discharge an employee; however, it will not generally constitute disqualifying misconduct under the unemployment compensation law. See Stringfellow v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 920 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“[bjecause there [was] no showing in the record that claimant repeatedly violated explicit policies after several warnings,” the court found that claimant’s violation of the employer’s policies without warning did not constitute…
Authorities Cited
- ASH v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 872 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
- Thomas v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 864 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)