JACK KING, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Reeves v. State, 957 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 2007)
  …multiple crimes arise out of the same criminal episode, may a sentence under the Prison Releasee Reoffender (PRR) statute be followed by a Criminal Punishment Code (CPC) sentence that is not enhanced beyond the statutory maximum? In Reeves v. State, 920 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), the Fifth District answered this question in the affirmative. Leroy Reeves seeks review of that decision based on its express and direct conflict with the Second District’s decision in Rodriguez v. State, 883 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 2d…
• Cotto v. State, 139 So. 3d 283 (Fla. 2014)
  …rent with the habitual offender minimum mandatory sentences, since both of these minimum mandatory sentences are enhancements.” (citation omitted)). However, a PRR sentence is not an enhanced sentence within the meaning of Hale. See Reeves v. State, 920 So. 2d 724, 726 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), app’d 957 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 2007) (“The rule established in Hale and Daniels applies to sentences that have been enhanced beyond the statutory maximum. A PRR sentence is not enhanced beyond the statutory maximum. Consequentl…
• Walsh v. State, 198 So. 3d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …oes not increase the possible sentence beyond the statutory maximum. Hale prohibits consecutive sentencing only where the sentence is already enhanced beyond the statutory maximum. See Cotto v. State, 139 So. 3d 283, 289 (Fla.2014); Reeves v. State, 920 So. 2d 724, 726 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), app’d 957 So. 2d 625 (Fla.2007). The PRR statute specifically states the legislative intent to punish PRRs to “the fullest extent of the law.” Cotto, 139 So. 3d at 289 (quoting § 775.082(9)(d)(l), Fla. Stat. (2002), contras…