CLOVIS MONFISTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2006-03-01
No. 4D04-3714
POLEN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
920 So. 2d 1286 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006) Caution
Cited by 24 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed; see Monfiston v. State, No. 4D04-836, — So. 2d —, 2006 WL 349488 (Fla. 4th DCA Feb.15, 2006).

POLEN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (13 total)

  • BGT Grp., Inc. v. Tradewinds Engine Servs., LLC, 62 So. 3d 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …hem or attach them to the quote and purchase order. Here, there was less description of the “terms and conditions” than there was of the document sought to be incorporated in Affinity Internet, Inc. v. Consolidated Credit Counseling Services, Inc., 920 So. 2d 1286, 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), where we found a description of a collateral document insufficient to create an incorporation of it by reference. In Affinity, a computer service contract stated that the contract was “subject to all of [the service provid…
  • Orthopedic Specialists v. Allstate Ins. Co., 177 So. 3d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
    …the language at dispute here and found it to be ambiguous: The “subject to provision” is intrinsically ambiguous, with many possible meanings. In context all of them create ambiguity. See Affinity Internet Inc. v. Consol. Credit Couns. Serv., Inc., 920 So. 2d 1286, 1289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) ... (subject to means “liable, subordinate, inferior, obedient to; governed or affected by; provided; answerable” (quoting BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1425 (6th ed[J 1990))). In fact its customary legal use is really only to “in…
  • …“subject to the terms and provisions of [the ground] lease.” To us, this language simply means that any sublessee must agree to abide by all obligations of the ground lease. See Affinity Internet, Inc. v. Consolidated Credit Counseling Serv., Inc., 920 So. 2d 1286, [*207] 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“The words ‘subject to’ ‘usually indicate a condition to one party’s duty of performance and not a promise by the other.’ ”) quoting Burgess Constr. Co. v. M. Morrin & Son Co., Inc., 526 F. 2d 108, 113 (10th Cir.197…

Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw