WILLIAM HALE, PETITIONER,

v.

JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., SEC., FLA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND JOSEPH THOMPSON, WARDEN AT FLORIDA STATE PRISON, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Wilman Ramon Collando-Pena v. State, 141 So. 3d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
  …2d 994, 995 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, an appellant is permitted to file a motion to correct sentencing error in the trial court after the Anders brief is served but before the appellant’s pro se brief is served. See id.; cf. Paige v. State, 921 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (on appellant’s motion to withdraw initial brief) (concluding, in a non-Anders direct appeal, that the filing/service of the initial brief foreclosed defendant’s right to pursue a rule 3.800(b)(2) remedy to correct sentencing err…
• Hale v. McNEIL, 988 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
  …petition for all writs in this Court following the voluntary dismissal of his initial appeal. Since the petition is not included in the record, it is impossible to know what arguments it contained. This Court denied the petition. See Hale v. Crosby, 921 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).…
• Erester Markque Ashford v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D332 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)
  …ief on May 22, 2024.* It was not until September 23, 2024, that Ashford filed his motion to strike his initial brief. Because Ashford has already served his initial brief in this case, “the rule 3.800(b)(2) remedy is foreclosed.” See Paige v. State, 921 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Striking Ashford’s initial brief as he requests would in effect “circumvent the express time frames designated by the rule.” See Hill v. State, 890 So. 2d 368, 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). This we will not do. As a result, Ashford’s…

Authorities Cited

• Hollingsworth v. Szczecina, 731 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)