B.P. AND R.P., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT, ETC., APPELLANT,

v.

G.A.R. AND W.M.R., ADOPTIVE PARENTS, ETC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dep't OF Revenue & The Div. of Risk Management-State of Fla. v. Groman, 46 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …1996) (accepting jurisdiction of non-final order which determined “subject matter jurisdiction” where order was entered compelling claimant to attend IME prior to filing of claim, and in absence of pending claim); and Canovas v. Sugar Supply, Inc., 921 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (accepting jurisdiction under Rule 9.180(b)(1) where JCC compelled discovery over Claimant’s objection regarding JCC’s jurisdiction over case based on absence of pending dispute or claim); with Kimmins Corp. v. Collier, 664 So. 2…
• Covell v. Cracker Barrel OLD Country Store, 118 So. 3d 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
  …lacked jurisdiction over the motion because no petition for benefits (PFB) had been filed. We conclude that a JCC has jurisdiction to compel the production of documentary evidence, even before the filing of a PFB. See Canovas v. Sugar Supply, Inc., 921 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). In reaching this conclusion, we address only the jurisdictional issue and not whether Claimant is entitled to the discovery requested. See Stanberry v. Escambia County, 813 So. 2d 278, 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (explaining review…
• Vazquez v. Romero, 179 So. 3d 402 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
  …eney Bros. Inc., 98 So. 3d 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (permitting JCC to award attorney’s fee to counsel for claim-, ant who. was pursuing benefits, when claimant’s- deposition was taken prior to filing of formal claim); Canovas v. Sugar Supply, Inc., 921 So. 2d 26 (Fla., 1st DCA 2006) (permitting JCC to compel claimant who was receiving workers! compensation benefits to release Social Security Administration records to employer/carrier while no PFB was pending); Southeast Recy cling Corp. v. McClure, 658 So.…

Authorities Cited

• Buckner v. Fam. Servs. OF Cent. Fla., Inc., 876 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)