JARED S. FOX, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2006-02-08
No. 4D04-4415
STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
921 So. 2d 701 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A defendant has the right to be present at the pronouncement of judgment and imposition of sentence, and absence from this critical stage requires reversal.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant's probation was revoked, but the case was remanded for reconsideration of one violation. The trial court held a hearing without the appellan…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jared Fox, previously appealed an order revoking his probation. See Fox v. State, 876 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). This court reversed the revocation, finding that two of the three grounds alleged failed for insufficient evidence. We remanded appellant’s case to the trial court to consider whether to revoke his probation for the remaining violation.

The trial court held.a hearing at which appellant was not present. It reconsidered its decision and affirmed its original sentence. Appellant filed a Motion to Correct Sentencing Error arguing that he had the right to be present at his sentencing hearing. The trial court denied the motion holding that it considered what was required of it and affirmed the sentence. We reverse.

A revocation of probation is a judgment. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.670. Appellant was then to be re-sentenced. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.180(a)(9) provides that a defendant shall be present “at the pronouncement of judgment and the imposition of sentence.” Because appellant was absent at this critical stage of the proceedings, we reverse and remand for a re-sentencing hearing at which appellant is present.

Reversed and Remanded.

STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • FOX v. State, 60 So. 3d 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …, and affirmed before the 2007 belated appeal. See Fox v. State, 949 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Fox v. State, 956 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). The belated appeal granted in 2007 concerned appellant’s 2006 resentencing only. See Fox v. State, 921 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (reversing and remanding for resentencing because sentencing was a critical stage requiring defendant’s presence). Appellant thereafter filed two more postconviction motions again challenging the 2003 revocation of his probation.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw