NOEL K. BANGO, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES V. CROSBY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
NOEL K. BANGO, PETITIONER,
JAMES V. CROSBY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
921 So. 2d 779
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. As the circuit court entered its order without affording petitioner time to file his reply to the Department’s response, we quash the order of the circuit court. This case is hereby remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. See Forbes v. Crosby, 866 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). In light of this disposition, we decline to address the correctness of the circuit court’s decision at this time.
PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
ERVIN, WOLF and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Massery v. State, 953 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…orthiness in the lab report, the report will be inadmissible. See § 90.803(6)(a), Fla. Stat. Id. at 627-28. In fact, we have applied the Peters reasoning in a probation revocation case not involving a true split sentence. . See Ramsey v. State, 921 So. 2d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). There is no valid basis for treating other types of probation revocation cases differently than those involving true split sentencing.…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Raia v. Raia, 866 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)