ADRIAN MOSLEY, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2006-02-23
No. 1D05-3687
BARFIELD, WOLF and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
921 So. 2d 780 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated appeal of the judgment and sentence rendered on April 26, 2005, in Alachua County Circuit Court case number 04-2002-CF-0504-A. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.

PETITION GRANTED.

BARFIELD, WOLF and BROWNING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Daniels v. State, 66 So. 3d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
    …urt was required to grant a defendant’s motion to dismiss a postconviction claim without prejudice, so long as it was filed before the court ruled on the underlying claim and dismissal would not cause prejudice to the State. See Hutchinson v. State, 921 So. 2d 780, 781 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Hansen v. State, 816 So. 2d 808, 809 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); see also Clark v. State, 491 So. 2d 545, 546 (Fla.1986); Carvalleria v. State, 675 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Washington v. State, 937 So. 2d 271, 272 (Fla. 4th…
  • Hampton v. State, 949 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
    …ea). Unless there is prejudice to the state, a rule 3.850 movant is entitled to withdraw his motion before it is ruled on. See Clark v. State, 491 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 1986); Washington v. State, 937 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Hutchinson v. State, 921 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Johnson v. State, 739 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). We conclude that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law when it did not allow Defendant to withdraw his motion in its entirety and to refile it. Beca…
  • Davis v. State, 28 So. 3d 168 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
    …on on the merits. Because the motion for a voluntary dismissal was filed before the court ruled on his postcon-viction motion and there was no prejudice to the state, the appellant was entitled to withdraw his rule 8.850 motion. Hutchinson v. State, 921 So. 2d 780, 781 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse the denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, and remand in order for the postconviction court to grant the appellant’s motion for voluntary dismissal. REVERSED and REMANDED. WOLF,…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw