RELYEA THEARTIS RICHARDSON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Talbott v. Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc., 934 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …rida’s offer of judgment statute and precludes Isuzu from recovering attorney’s fees. We disagree and affirm the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs. While this appeal was pending, the Fifth District, in Marcy v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp., 921 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), issued its opinion explaining why the Magnuson-Moss Act does not preempt Florida’s offer of judgment statute. We write to express our agreement with the result in Marcy. Vicky Talbott, unhappy with her brand new 2002 Isuzu Troo…
• City OF Orlando & Lasercraft, Inc. v. Udowychenko, 98 So. 3d 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)
  …y judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue of material fact and if the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Id. Questions of statutory application and preemption are also reviewed de novo. Marcy v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 921 So. 2d 781, 783 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). We find the trial court did not err. The City’s ordinance provides that a failure to stop at a red light is a civil, noncriminal infraction and authorizes the use of cameras to record images of motor vehicles running red l…
• 770 PPR, LLC v. TJCV Land Tr., 30 So. 3d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …uine issues of material fact existed, entitling it to summary judgment as a matter of law. We affirm. “When faced with questions of statutory application and federal preemption, we apply a de novo standard of review.” Many v. DaimlerChnysler Carp., 921 So. 2d 781, 783 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Review of an order granting summary judgment is de novo. See Fla. Bar v. Greene, 926 So. 2d 1195,1200 (Fla.2006). Florida’s Requirement of Certificate of Authority Section 607.01401(12), Florida Statutes (2009), defines a…