FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, PETITIONER,
v.
S.D., RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2006-02-27
No. 1D05-5800
ERVIN, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
921 So. 2d 801 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Because the lower court violated the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children, codified at section 409.401, Florida Statutes (2005), by placing the child, M.T. with her mother, S.D., in Georgia, which is not a “visit” under ICPC Regulation No. 9, without obtaining the consent of the appropriate public authorities of Georgia, we GRANT the petition for writ of certiorari, vacate the order, and remand for further proceedings. See H.P v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 838 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

ERVIN, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dep't OF Child. & Families v. C.T., 144 So. 3d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
    …never assumed custody. Any potential confusion in this District caused by language in L.G. that seemed to imply that the ICPC only applied when placement was into “foster care” should have been resolved by Department of Children & Families v. S.D., 921 So. 2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), which cited with approval H.P. v. Department of Children & [*686] Families, 838 So. 2d 583, 586 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), which expressly held that the ICPC applies when a court exercises its jurisdiction to place a child with an out…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw