J. PEARL MORICE, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES MORICE, APPELLEE
J. PEARL MORICE, APPELLANT,
JAMES MORICE, APPELLEE
922 So. 2d 221
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. Proc. 9.315(a).
GRIFFIN, THOMPSON, PALMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Otano v. Star Cas. Ins. Co., 927 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…On Motion For Rehearing and/Or Clarification PER CURIAM. We grant the petitioner’s motion for rehearing. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the authority of Progressive Express Insurance Co. v. Miami Dade Health & Rehab Services, 922 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), and Brass & Singer, P.A. v. United Automobile Insurance Co., 919 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). However, as in these cases, we certify conflict with Gedeon v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 805 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).…