BLOSSOM COHEN AND ABRAHAM COHEN, HER HUSBAND, PETITIONERS,
v.
HUMANA MEDICAL PLANS, INC., A CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN FLORIDA, MARK FREEMAN, M.D., MARK FREEMAN, M.D., P.A., RAPHAEL RODRIGUEZ, M.D., P.A., AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER, INC., RESPONDENTS
BLOSSOM COHEN AND ABRAHAM COHEN, HER HUSBAND, PETITIONERS,
HUMANA MEDICAL PLANS, INC., A CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN FLORIDA, MARK FREEMAN, M.D., MARK FREEMAN, M.D., P.A., RAPHAEL RODRIGUEZ, M.D., P.A., AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER, INC., RESPONDENTS
922 So. 2d 1106
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Cohen v. Freeman, 914 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), does not preclude the trial court from conducting an evidentiary hearing on the nature and extent of the settlement agreement and its terms. The opinion rejects Dr. Freeman’s claim that he had the right to control the malpractice litigation.
SHAHOOD, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harvey v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co., 69 So. 3d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Riggs v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 36 So. 3d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). As to denial of appellant’s motion for reconsideration without holding a hearing thereon, see Aubourg v. Erazo, 922 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). GROSS, C.J., POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.…1 / 2
-
Thomas v. Khadejah Cromer (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)…g, . . . due process requires a hearing on such a motion before a trial court can grant the motion and amend a final judgment.” J.R. Fenton, Inc. v. Gallery 600, Inc., 488 So. 2d 587, 588 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (citations omitted); see Aubourg v. Erazo, 922 So. 2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (discussing relevant precedents and noting the holding that “although rule 1.530 contains no requirement for a live hearing, due process requires such a proceeding before a trial court can grant a motion for rehearing”) (em…
-
Mark Freeman, M.D. v. Blossom Cohen and Abraham Cohen, 969 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…court from conducting an evidentia-ry hearing on the nature and extent of the settlement agreement and its terms. The opinion rejects Dr. Freeman’s claim that he had the right to control the malpractice litigation. Cohen v. Humana Med. Plans, Inc., 922 So. 2d 1106, 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“Cohen II”). After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court granted the Cohens’ motion to enforce the settlement with Med Pro in the amount of $335,700. This appeal followed.4 Although Dr. Freeman, Dr. Rodriguez, and the F…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Blossom Cohen v. Freeman, 914 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)