LINDWARD SNOW, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Shepard v. State, 939 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …man and Tracy because although Shepard’s probation order did not include a time limit by which Shepard was required to have paid, it did include a schedule in that the order required payment to be made in monthly installments. See Francois v. State, 923 So. 2d 1219, 1222 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). We find this sufficient in the present case and affirm Shepard’s revocation as to this issue. The trial court found Shepard guilty of allegations II and III for his failure to report to probation. These allegations are not…
• Roundtree v. State, 955 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
  …ram. The probation order contained no schedule or time frame for completion of these two conditions. There was a year left on his probation giving him sufficient time to complete these two requirements before the year had run. See Francois v. State, 923 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (trial court erred in finding violation of condition of probation for failure to complete community [*1187] hours where the order of probation did not contain a schedule or time frame for completing the hours and there was suffici…
• Hileman v. State, 2 So. 3d 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
  …the basis that defendant committed a new violation of law must be corrected on remand, because a violation of probation must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. Michael v. State, 992 So. 2d 367, 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Francois v. State, 923 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). The defendant admitted the other two grounds; we, therefore, affirm the revocation but remand to the trial court to correct the sentence to omit any reference to the new violation of [*1066] law. See Bitzer v. State, 958 So. 2d 1…

Authorities Cited

• Bryant v. State, 800 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
• State v. Moten, 698 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)