MICHAEL CONE, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLEE
MICHAEL CONE, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLEE
924 So. 2d 941
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Based upon a special master’s finding that the notice of appeal was not timely filed, this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
ERVIN, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Larocka v. Larocka, 43 So. 3d 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…There is no legal basis for allowing the children’s therapist to make the final call on when the new wife can be allowed to be in the presence of the children. This determination is solely within the province of a court of law.”); Shugar v. Shugar, 924 So. 2d 941, 942 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“Courts may not delegate their statutory authority to determine visitation to [guardians ad li-tem], attorneys, or experts.” (citing McAlister v. Shaver, 633 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Wattles v. Wattles, 631 So. 2d 34…
-
Srinath Subramanian v. Veena Subramanian, 239 So. 3d 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
-
Barrack v. Barrack, 46 Fla. L. Weekly S93 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)…portion of the order impermissibly delegated to the former wife and therapists the trial court’s authority to reestablish former husband’s parenting time. See Subramanian v. Subramanian, 239 So. 3d 719, 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018); Shugar v. Shugar, 924 So. 2d 941, 942 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“Courts may not delegate their statutory authority to determine visitation to GALs, attorneys, or experts.”). We also note former husband’s argument that the order fails to include the “concrete steps” that he must…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence