FELIX CAMPOS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. D.O., 56 So. 3d 114 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
  …an adult case, “a violation of the five and ten-day periods provided in [Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure] 3.191(p)(3) is harmless if a defendant is actually brought to trial within fifteen days of filing his notice of expiration”); S.D. v. State, 924 So. 2d 963, 964 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (finding rule 8.090(m)(3) substantively indistinguishable from rule 3.191(p)(3), and that the rule 3.191(p)(3) analysis in Salzero applies to rule 8.090(m)(3)). [*116] Despite D.O.’s confession of error, he argues that this…
• State v. D.A., 939 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …eedy trial-rule 3.191-and rule 8.090 form continuum within which all aspects of speedy trial lie in neat relationship and are to be read as in pari materia”) (citing J.B. v. Korda, 436 So. 2d 1109, 1110 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)); see also, S.D. v. State, 924 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). . Both the original petition and the amended petition correctly alleged D.A.’s date of birth as October 8, 1989 (making him 15 years old at the time of the alleged crime). . Justices Wells and Bell have concluded that this jud…

Authorities Cited

• Tavares Derel Gibson v. State, 792 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)