HECTOR MURILLO, APPELLANT,
v.
TRI-STATE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, INC., AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellant Murillo appealed a final order awarding attorney's fees to Travelers Insurance Co. under Florida's frivolous proceedings statute. The court affirmed the fee award, rejecting Murillo's arguments that the judge lacked jurisdiction after he served a notice of voluntary dismissal and that the evidence was insufficient.
The court held that the JCC retained jurisdiction to award fees despite the partial dismissal notice because any attempt to dismiss less than the entire action is a nullity that does not terminate the court's jurisdiction. The court affirmed the sufficiency of evidence and the JCC's evidentiary rulings without further discussion.
[1] A trial court retains jurisdiction to award attorney's fees authorized by statute or contract after a plaintiff files a voluntary dismissal.
[2] An attempted dismissal of less than an entire action is a nullity and does not terminate the court's jurisdiction.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“after a voluntary dismissal by a plaintiff the trial court does have jurisdiction to award attorney's fees where the fees are authorized by statute or a contract between the parties”
Establishes that courts retain fee-award authority despite voluntary dismissal when fees are statutorily authorized
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMurillo initiated workers' compensation proceedings against Tri-State Employment Services and Travelers Insurance. He served a Notice of Voluntary Dis…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jurisdiction After Voluntary Dismissal cases and more on FLexlaw
KAHN, C.J.
Appellant seeks review of a final order granting fees to Appellee, Travelers Insurance Co., pursuant to section 440.32(2), Florida Statutes (2002). That statute provides:
If the judge of compensation claims or any court having jurisdiction of proceedings in respect to any claims or defense under this section determines that the proceedings were maintained or continued frivolously,' the cost of the proceedings, including reasonable attorney’s fees, shall be assessed against the offending attorney. If a penalty is assessed under this subsection, a copy of the order assessing the penalty must be forwarded to the appropriate grievance committee acting under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Penalties, fees, and costs awarded under this provision may not be recouped from the party.
Appellant raises three points: (1) the JCC lacked jurisdiction to award fees under this statute because Appellant had served a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Travelers; (2) the evidence was not sufficient to support the JCC’s award of fees; and (3) the JCC abused his discretion in allowing Travelers’ witnesses to testify at the evidentiary hearing on attorney’s fees. We affirm the latter two points without further discussion.
We also find no merit to Appellant’s first point. According to Florida law, “after a voluntary dismissal by a plaintiff the trial court does have jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees where the fees are authorized by statute or a contract between the parties.” Stuart Plaza, Ltd. v. Atl. Coast Dev. Corp. of Martin County, 493 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); accord. Garcell v. Holder, 689 So. 2d 1177, 1178 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Century Constr. Corp. v. Koss, 559 So. 2d 611, 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Moreover, although Appellant served a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Travelers, the claim pending before the JCC was never dismissed. “Any attempt to dismiss less than the entire action is a nullity, and does not terminate the court’s jurisdiction.” Perez v. Winn-Dixie, 639 So. 2d 109, 112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). At all relevant times, the JCC here had jurisdiction over the claim, Appellant, and Travelers.
AFFIRMED.
LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Stuart Plaza, Ltd. v. Atl. Coast Dev. Corp. OF Martin Cnty., 493 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- Perez v. Winn-Dixie & Crawford & Co., 639 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Century Constr. Corp. v. Koss, 559 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Garcell v. Bennie R. Holder, 689 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)