J. W. JOHNSON, ET AL.,
v.
SIDNEY MADDOCK
J. W. JOHNSON, ET AL.,
SIDNEY MADDOCK
111 Fla. 233
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 149 So. 334
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davidson v. Puss Powers, 114 Fla. 109 (Fla. 1934)…of the County Judge’s office, as, an incident to a pending controversy of which the paper (last will and testament) so sought to be re-established was the subject matter. This we judicially know from our own records (Davidson v. Ford, 111 Fla. 270, 149 Sou. Rep. 334) as well as from the record brought here in the transcript filed on the present appeal. According to the petition filed, the re-establishment of the will was sought as part of a course of procedure instituted by Lavinia Ford and others against A. J…
-
Monarch Fire Ins. Co. v. Fla. Asphalt Paving Co., 116 Fla. 14 (Fla. 1934)…tled in this State that the prosecution of an appeal from a final decree on' the merits operates as a general appearance when the cause is remanded to the court below. See Ortell v. Ortell, 91 Fla. 50, 107 So. 442, and cases cited; Davidson v. Ford, 149 Sou. 334; Fuller v. Burruss, 102 Fla. 1145, 137 So. 241. Likewise, the suing out of a writ of error to a final judgment at law operates as a general appearance when the cause is remanded. Drew Lumber Co. v. Walter, et al., 45 Fla. 253, 34 So. 244; Barwick v.…
-
Johnson v. Maddock, 119 Fla. 777 (Fla. 1935)…d verdict in favor of defendant was granted. There had been a former trial of the case in which the plaintiff prevailed and a new trial had been granted. Writ of error was taken to the order granting the new trial and-was affirmed by this Court. See 111 Fla. 233, 149 Sou. 334. The disposition in this Court at that time was by a Per'Curiam Order of Affirmance and the only effect of that order was to hold, that it had not been made to appear that the trial judge abused judicial discretion in granting the moti…