STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MARK K. SACHS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2006-04-12
No. 3D04-1244
Before GERSTEN, RAMIREZ, and SHEPHERD, JJ.
926 So. 2d 440 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*441] PER CURIAM.

Based on the parties’ stipulation at the trial level as to the controlling effect of State v. Harden, 873 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (finding section 409.920(2)(e), Florida Statutes, unconstitutional), appeal pending, No. SC04-613, we hereby affirm.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Sachs, 948 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 2007)
    …PER CURIAM. We have for review State v. Sachs, 926 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), in which the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s ruling based upon the parties’ stipulation at the trial level as to the controlling effect of State v. Harden, 873 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), aff'd, 938 S…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw