WALTER NOBLE GRANDISON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WALTER NOBLE GRANDISON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
926 So. 2d 447
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges his convictions for possession of cannabis and cocaine. Because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove his actual dr constructive possession of the contraband, the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. See Hill v. State, 736 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); see also Watson v. State, 877 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Cruz v. State, 744 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Agee v. State, 522 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We accordingly reverse the appellant’s convictions and remand this case with directions that he be discharged.
ALLEN, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ„ Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Agee v. State, 522 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
- Chastity Anne Cruz v. State, 744 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
- Hill v. State, 736 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Watson v. State, 877 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)