MYNOR J. RAMOS, APPELLANT,
v.
ROSS STORES, INC., ETC., APPELLEE
MYNOR J. RAMOS, APPELLANT,
ROSS STORES, INC., ETC., APPELLEE
927 So. 2d 162
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Zimmerman v. Eckerd Corp., 839 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hogan v. State, 12 So. 3d 835 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…2d 197, 199-200 (Fla.2004). Thus, even if the State had not filed the motions years late, nothing in rule 3.800 authorized a motion for rehearing or a motion for clarification when the judges entered their orders in 2000 and 2002. In Ruiz v. State, 927 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), the defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for clarification. The motion requested an amendment of his sentencing orders to reflect credit for prison time served before the revocation of his probation. The Third Dist…
-
Lesende v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)…rred by denying his motion for clarification wherein he sought a determination that his term of probation began upon the pronouncement of his sentence. Lesende's motion is essentially a motion to correct sentence under 3.800(a). See Ruiz v. State, 927 So. 2d 162, 163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("[T]he defendant's motion for clarification is, in essence, a motion to correct an illegal sentence and award credit for time served pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)."); Nelson v. State, 720 So. 2d 110…
-
Garcia v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2025)
Authorities Cited
- Zimmerman v. Eckerd Corp., 839 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)