ROGES EXAUS, APPELLANT,
v.
VALERIE DANIELS, APPELLEE
ROGES EXAUS, APPELLANT,
VALERIE DANIELS, APPELLEE
929 So. 2d 38
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Dep’t of Revenue v. Harris, 684 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sullivan v. Mark David Kanarek, M.D., & Nadal Pediatrics, P.A., 34 So. 3d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…ge is in a much better position to make such a ruling given that the presiding trial judge witnessed the trial firsthand. In fact, a successor judge is in no better a position than the appellate court to make such a ruling. See Peterson v. Peterson, 929 So. 2d 38, 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). This court has recognized that a successor judge may be required to grant a new trial as a matter of law when the successor judge did not observe factors, such as the demeanor or credibility of a witness, that could have bee…
Authorities Cited
- Haas v. Zephyr Springs Golf Club, L.P., 684 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)