LAMAR ANTONIO SMITH, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Schmidt v. Drew D. Schmidt, 997 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …e testimony of witnesses or of evidentiary rulings and where a statement of the record has not been prepared, a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed.”); see also Marshall, 953 So. 2d at 25; Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So. 2d 671, 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Novom v. Novom, 513 So. 2d 789, 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). In doing so, we find no error in the trial court’s rulings concerning the distribution of the money market account funds, [*453] the resolution of the issues relating…
• Murphy v. Murphy, 948 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …obligation. Our review is limited because of the lack of a trial transcript.1 In the absence of a trial transcript, we are obligated to affirm the trial court unless fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order. Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). See also Carney v. Carney, 861 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). A final judgment of dissolution of marriage was entered on April 3, 2003. The marital settlement agreement, which was incorporated into the final judgment, provide…
• FAY v. Craig, 99 So. 3d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)
  …proceed at their peril when they furnish a partial transcript. See, e.g., Estes v. Sassano, 47 So. 3d 383 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Cave v. Rios, 15 So. 3d 760 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Schmitt v. Maile, 946 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Nor should Appellant assume that he will get another “opportunity” to supplement the record pursuant to rule 9.200(f)(2). Courts often conclude that the “opportunity” to supplement the record afforded by rule 9.200(f)(2) is waiv…

Authorities Cited

• Fisher v. State, 924 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)