O.R.C., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Stang v. State, 937 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …were committed [*1172] under more than one version or revision of the guidelines, separate scoresheets must be prepared and used at sentencing. The sentencing court may impose such sentence concurrently or consecutively.” See also Daniels v. State, 929 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). In this case, however, Stang waived the requirement for two scoresheets in the course of his original negotiated plea. There is no Florida law entirely on point. All of the state’s cited decisions in support of agreed-to senten…
• Michanowicz v. State, 935 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000),] purposes [a]s the maximum sentence a judge may impose solely on the basis of the facts reflected in the jury verdict or admitted by the defendant”) (emphasis omitted); Daniels v. State, 929 So. 2d 710, 31 Fla. L. Weekly D1460, D1461 (Fla. 1st DCA May 25, 2006) (“[T]here is no Apprendi violation [where], as the record indicates, the ... additional [scoresheet] points did not cause Appellant’s sentence ... to exceed the prescribed statutory maximum…
• Delma McNally Blair v. State, 181 So. 3d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
  …ed as additional offenses.”). Unassailed here, the revocation of appellant’s probation stands. Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing. ROBERTS, C.J. and KELSEY, J., concur. . See Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620, 627 (Fla.2000); Daniels v. State, 929 So. 2d 710, 712 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). . If, as Mr. Blair asserts, he had completed service of his sentence for the third-degree felony conviction for impregnation of a minor, it was error to score this conviction ás an additional offense upon revocation of pro…

Authorities Cited

• State v. R.R., 697 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)