ERIK T. ABBOT, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ERIK T. ABBOT, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
929 So. 2d 723
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 36 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Abbot petitions this court for a belated appeal. We deny his petition without prejudice. To the extent Abbot claims ineffective assistance of counsel, he must pursue these claims by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 in the trial court. To the extent that he seeks a belated appeal, his pleading is insufficient because his petition is un-sworn. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(3)(F); Cosby v. State, 911 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
Petition for Belated Appeal DENIED Without Prejudice.
SHARP, W., SAWAYA and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Env't Servs., Inc. v. Carter, 9 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)…ally, section 542.335, Florida Statutes (2005), which took effect on July 1, 1996, contains a comprehensive framework for analyzing, evaluating and enforcing restrictive covenants contained in employment contracts. Henao v. Prof'l Shoe Repair, Inc., 929 So. 2d 723, 726 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). A violation of an enforceable restrictive covenant creates a presumption of irreparable injury. Id. Section 542.335 employs the term “restrictive covenants” and includes all contractual restrictions such as noncompetition/n…
-
Univ. Med. Clinics, Inc. v. Quality Health Plans, Inc., 51 So. 3d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…or temporary injunc-tive relief. 11. The nonsolicitation, nondisclosure and non-interference provision of the Agreement are of the type enforceable under Florida Statutes § 542.335, and other applicable law. Henao v. Professional Shoe Repair, Inc., 929 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). 13. The Agreement further requires that UMC maintain medical and other records relating to the treatment by its physicians of QHP Members, and that during the term of the Agreement and after, UMC would make such records availab…
-
White v. Mederi Caretenders Visiting Servs. OF Se. Fla., LLC, 226 So. 3d 774 (Fla. 2017)…eir connection to Hapney, consideration of the interests in the statutory list reveals only one discernable similarity: preventing unfair competition by protecting crucial business interests.2 See § 542.335(1) (b); Henao v. Prof'l Shoe Repair, Inc., 929 So. 2d 723, 726-27 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Grant & Steele, supra, at 53-54. As an HHO’s most important business asset, referral sources appear to follow the legitimate business interests listed in the statute. See Infinity Home, 180 So. 3d at 1065-66 (calling ref…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cosby v. State, 911 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)