DONNA REUTER, ETC., PETITIONER,
v.
MCKENZIE CHECK ADVANCE OF FLORIDA, LLC, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stare Decisis cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Reuter v. McKenzie Check Advance of Florida, LLC, 825 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), which cited to a case that was pending review in this Court (Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 824 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), revieio granted, 844 So. 2d 645 (Fla.2003)). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § (3)(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1981). Since the petition for review was filed in this case, both this Court and the United States Supreme Court have reviewed and ruled on the issue raised in the Cardegna case. See Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., 894 So. 2d 860 (Fla.2005), rev’d, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1204, 163 L.Ed.2d 1038 (2006).
Because the decision of the Fourth District in Reuter is in accord with the controlling United States Supreme Court decision in Cardegna, we decline to accept jurisdiction in this case.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, C.J., did not participate.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Visiting Nurse Ass'n OF Fla., Inc. v. Jupiter Med. Ctr., Inc., 154 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 2014)…violates state law, but also is criminal in nature.’ ” Id. at 443, 126 S.Ct. 1204 (quoting Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., 894 So. 2d 860, 870 (Fla. 2005) rev’d, 546 U.S. 440, 126 S.Ct. 1204, 163 L.Ed.2d 4038 (2006), and opinion withdrawn, 930 So. 2d 610 (Fla.2006)). The United States Supreme Court then granted certiorari review. The Supreme Court began its analysis' by noting that Congress enacted the FAA to overcome judicial resistance to arbitration. Id. It then observed that challenges to the v…1 / 2
-
ATP Flight Sch., LLC v. SAX, 44 So. 3d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…The Florida Supreme Court, in citing the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440, 126 S.Ct. 1204, 163 L.Ed.2d 1038 (2006), has approved of our decision. Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., 930 So. 2d 610, 611 (Fla.2006). .In Nagrampa, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a franchise agreement which contained a provision requiring the parties to arbitrate "any dispute that arises out of or relates to the franchise agreement.” 469 F. 3d at 1265.…
-
Lopez v. Ernie Haire Ford, Inc., 974 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)…nt under the Florida supreme court’s subsequently withdrawn decision, which held that arbitration was not available where the underlying contract was void or illegal. See Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., 894 So. 2d 860 (Fla.2005), withdrawn, 930 So. 2d 610 (Fla.2006). See Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440, 126 S.Ct. 1204, 163 L.Ed.2d 1038 (2006) (holding that claim that purportedly usurious contract con-taming arbitration provision was void for illegality was to be determined by ar…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (U.S. 2006)
- Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., 894 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 2005)
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 824 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- Reuter v. McKenzie check advance of Fla., LLC, 825 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)