MICHAEL RENDER, PETITIONER,
v.
DEPT. OF CORRECTION, RESPONDENT
MICHAEL RENDER, PETITIONER,
DEPT. OF CORRECTION, RESPONDENT
930 So. 2d 776
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Banks v. State, 916 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
WOLF, BROWNING, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Leslie v. Carnival Corp., 22 So. 3d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…njury claims against Carnival in this case. In this regard, we note we have not been unduly disturbed by trial court enforcement of the identical forum-selection clause in earlier cases that have come before this Court. See Assiff v. Carnival Corp., 930 So. 2d 776, 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (affirming trial court order that declined to “transfer” to United States District Court an action that had been dismissed under identical forum-selection clause); Carnival Corp. v. Middleton, 941 So. 2d 421, 423 (Fla. 3d DCA…
-
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Clarke, 148 So. 3d 155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…nforced similar forum selection clauses and has recognized dismissal as a proper mechanism to enforce a forum selection clause of a cruise ticket. Weisenberg v. Costa Crociere, S.p.A., 35 So. 3d 910, 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Assiff v. Carnival Corp., 930 So. 2d 776, 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). We thus conclude that Clarke is bound by the forum selection clause contained in the ticket contract because Royal Caribbean reasonably communicated to her the terms and conditions of the ticket contract, and we further con…
Authorities Cited
- Robert E. Banks v. State, 916 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)