MIGUEL MADRASO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MIGUEL MADRASO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
931 So. 2d 1025
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Stuart v. State, 771 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lawnwood Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Rouse, 394 So. 3d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
-
de Acosta v. Naples Cmty. Hosp. Inc. (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
-
Ocean-Yachts, Inc. v. Fla. Yachts Int'l, Inc., 960 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…arbitration agreements as they see fit. Just as they may limit by contract the issues which they will arbitrate, so too may they specify by contract the rules under which the arbitration will be conducted”); see also United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ortiz, 931 So. 2d 1025, 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“Pursuant to section 44.103(2), Florida Statutes (2005), a court ‘may refer any contested civil action filed in a circuit or county court to nonbinding arbitration.’ ”); Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v. Davis, 629 So. 2d 259, 26…
Authorities Cited
- Mac W. Stuart v. State, 771 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)