ROBERT M. GORDON, PETITIONER,
v.
EMILY J. GORDON, RESPONDENT

Fla. 4th DCA | 2006-03-31
No. 4D06-952
STEVENSON, C.J., TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
932 So. 2d 393 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 38 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner challenges the trial court’s issuance of an amended writ of bodily attachment, which directs the Sheriffs of Florida to arrest him in Maryland and to bring him to Florida for a hearing to determine his ability to pay support following a contempt finding. We grant the petition as the language of section 61.11(2), Florida Statutes (2005), limits its application to Florida. See also § 30.15(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005); Sanders v. Laird, 865 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

STEVENSON, C.J., TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (21 total)

  • Iralett Sha'ron Douglas v. Doyle Dawana Johnson, 65 So. 3d 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
    …violated that party’s fundamental right to procedural due process. L.C. v. A.M.C., 2011 WL 1775891 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (addressing a domestic violence injunction); Smith, 964 So. 2d at 219 (addressing a domestic violence injunction); Smith v. Crider, 932 So. 2d 393, 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (addressing a temporary custody modification). Here, the trial court abused its discretion by denying the Mother an opportunity to present witnesses or evidence at the hearing. The Mother’s right to procedural due process was…
  • Ingrid BON v. Nestor A. Rivera, 10 So. 3d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …, Gielchinsky v. Gielchinsky, 662 So. 2d 732, 733 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Where there is evidence of a true emergency, a trial court may enter an order temporarily modifying custody without affording prior notice to the opposing party. Smith v. Glider, 932 So. 2d 393, 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Here, the former husband presented no evidence of a true emergency and the former wife received prior notice of the former husband’s motion for a temporary change in custody. Accordingly, the “true emergency” test does not a…
  • Premier LAB Supply, Inc. v. Chemplex Indus., Inc., 10 So. 3d 202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …ference to a pleading or another document ...” Failure to include specific reasons for issuing the injunction has resulted in reversals of temporary injunctions. See, e.g., Green v. Studen, 622 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 4th [*207] DCA 1993); Smith v. Crider, 932 So. 2d 393, 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Indus. Waste Servs., Inc. v. Faircloth Sanitation, Inc., 643 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Based on the clear wording of the rule, the specificity requirement applies to both temporary and permanent injunctions. See Hasley…

Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw