EULICE GUEVARA-RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2006-07-07
No. 2D05-4110
DAVIS and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
932 So. 2d 1227 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2006) Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Topics
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(B) Anders V. California Motion To Correct Sentencing Error Preservation Of Error

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(B) cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
CANADY, Judge.

CANADY, Judge.

In this appeal briefed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Eulice Guevara-Rodriguez challenges her convictions and sentences for interference with child custody, giving a false name, having no valid vehicle registration, grand theft of a motor vehicle, possession .of drug paraphernalia, false imprisonment, and driving with a suspended license after prior violations. We affirm Guevara-Rodriguez’s convictions without comment. We also affirm the sentences as imposed.

We write only to point out that the State’s concession of error as to the imposition of the $3 teen court cost was erroneous. Guevara-Rodriguez failed to preserve that issue because she did not raise the matter at the sentencing hearing or file a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).

Affirmed.

DAVIS and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • A.M. v. State, 958 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
    …ctly by the defendant’s offense; and 2. Damage or loss related to the defendant’s criminal episode.” The State agrees that the battery victim’s loss does “not bear a significant relationship to” A.M.’s criminal mischief offense. See R.A.B. v. State, 932 So. 2d 1227, 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (reversing an order of restitution to a victim that did “not bear a significant relationship to the offense of obstructing or opposing an officer without violence”). However, the State requests that we remand the order to th…
  • K.N. v. State, 61 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
    …nt was confirmed by the prosecutor’s statement that “[wje’re reserving on resti [*1260] tution as well.” We do not agree that either the State’s unilateral intention or this statement evidences any such agreement on K.N.’s part. See R.A.B. v. State, 932 So. 2d 1227, 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“Although the State indicated that it was seeking restitution at the plea hearing, defense counsel did not concede that restitution was appropriate but merely agreed to set a restitution mediation date. Furthermore, the cou…
  • Jovan Cummings v. State, 39 So. 3d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
    …agreement indicating that Mr. Cummings agreed to pay restitution. Further, although the State asked the trial court at the plea hearing to “order and reserve on restitution,” Mr. Cummings did not orally agree to pay restitution. See R.A.B. v. State, 932 So. 2d 1227, 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (holding that record did not establish that restitution was a condition of appellant’s plea agreement where State noted it was seeking restitution at plea hearing, appellant merely agreed to set a restitution hearing date, a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw