CARL J. GAMBLE D/B/A CARL'S MAIN STREET CAFE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, APPELLEE
CARL J. GAMBLE D/B/A CARL'S MAIN STREET CAFE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, APPELLEE
932 So. 2d 1241
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice to appellant seeking relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. See Gundlah v. Moore, 831 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Brown v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 763 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gelsa A. Valenzuela v. Globeground N. Am., LLC, 18 So. 3d 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…addad v. Hester, 964 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), review denied, 980 So. 2d 489 (Fla.2008). We review the summary judgment under a de novo standard of review. Bryan v. Dethlefs, 959 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Am. Eng’g & Dev. Corp. v. Sanchez, 932 So. 2d 1241, 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). III. ANALYSIS The Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (“FCRA”) protects employees from gender discrimination in the workplace. See §§ 760.01-.il, Fla. Stat. (2005). It provides, in pertinent part: “It is an unlawful employme…
-
Bryan v. Dethlefs, 959 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…them as Bryan’s remaining descendants. For the foregoing reasons, we agree with Dethlefs. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW We review the order granting summary judgment under a de novo standard of review. American Engineering & Development Corp. v. Sanchez, 932 So. 2d 1241, 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Merlot Commc’ns, Inc. v. Shalev, 840 So. 2d 446, 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). The parties agree that the Trust provision is unambiguous and that its effect may be determined as a matter of law.2 See Angell v. Don Jones Ins. Agen…
-
Medley Warehouses, LC v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 39 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…favor of the non-moving party, there are any genuine issues of material fact, and, if not, whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law). Bryan v. Dethlefs, 959 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Am. Eng’g & Dev. Corp. v. Sanchez, 932 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). III. ANALYSIS The crux of this appeal centers on whether MDW remained Medley’s agent after Scottsdale delivered' the policy to Medley on January 10, 2005. In support of its motion for summary judgment, Scottsdale argued that it…
Authorities Cited
- Galindez v. State, 831 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
- Gundlah v. Moore, 831 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- Kevin v. Brown, 763 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
- Hall v. Bauwens, 763 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)