MICHAEL AGOSTO-MOLINA, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Agosto-Molina challenged his sentence for attempted second-degree murder on the ground that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve a sentencing error claim. The court agreed that the combined prison and probation sentence exceeded the statutory maximum and that appellate counsel should have filed a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct the sentencing error.
Appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct the sentencing error on the attempted second-degree murder conviction, which exceeded the statutory maximum for that offense.
[1] Appellate counsel renders ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to correct a sentencing error that exceeds the statutory maximum for the offense.
[2] A combined sentence of imprisonment and probation exceeding the statutory maximum for an offense constitutes an illegal sentence.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A combined sentence of prison and probation which exceeds the statutory maximum for an offense is an illegal sentence.”
Establishes the legal principle that triggered the sentencing error in this case
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAgosto-Molina pleaded guilty to attempted second-degree murder and discharging a firearm from a vehicle under a plea agreement capping his sentence at…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Ineffective Assistance Of Appellate Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
DAVIS, Judge.
Michael Agosto-Molina, in his petition filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 9.141(c), raises a single ground alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. He claims that appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to argue on direct appeal that the sentence imposed on his conviction for attempted second-degree murder was illegal because it violated the statutory maximum or, in the alternative, for failing to file a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct the sentencing error. We agree that appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance when he failed to file a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct the sentence on the attempted second-degree murder conviction.
Agosto-Molina pleaded guilty to attempted second-degree murder and discharging a firearm from a vehicle in exchange for a cap of ten years’ prison with the prison sentence to be followed by a period of probation. On the attempted second-degree murder conviction, Agosto-Molina was sentenced to eight years’ prison followed by ten years’ probation. Attempted second-degree murder is a second-degree felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment.1 §§ 782.04(2), 777.04(4)(c), 775.082(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2001). A combined sentence of prison and probation which exceeds the statutory maximum for an offense is an illegal sentence. See Schmidt v. State, 884 So. 2d 471, 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). However, to preserve this issue for review on direct appeal, a defendant must either object or file a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to rule 3.800(b). See Washington v. State, 814 So. 2d 1187, 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Drayton v. State, 791 So. 2d 522, 524 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). In the present case, there was no objection and no rule 3.800(b) motion was filed.
In Hakkenberg v. State, 889 So. 2d 935, 937 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), this court held: “Appellate counsel’s failure to preserve the sentencing error in this case for review by neglecting to file a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion in the trial court constitutes ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.” The same principle applies here. We therefore hold that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing error on the basis that Agosto-Molina’s sentence on the attempted second-degree murder conviction exceeded the statutory maximum for that offense. Had appellate counsel preserved this issue for review, we would have been compelled to reverse the sentence. Because a new appeal would be redundant in this case, we reverse Agosto-Molina’s sentence on the second-degree murder conviction and remand for resentencing. See id. On remand, the trial court shall impose a sentence that does not exceed the statutory maximum for the offense.
Petition granted.
STRINGER and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur. . Under the Criminal Punishment Code, where the statutory maximum for an offense is exceeded by the lowest permissible sentence as calculated on the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet, "the lowest permissible sentence under the Code becomes the maximum sentence which the trial judge can impose.” Butler v. State, 838 So. 2d 554, 556 (Fla.2003). However, in the present case, the lowest permissible sentence under the code was 6.5 years' prison.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Martinez v. State, 123 So. 3d 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…change with the learned trial judge had not itself been sufficient to preserve the point, appellate counsel would have been under an obligation to file a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). See, e.g., Agosto-Molina v. State, 933 So. 2d 26, 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (holding “appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing error”). The trial court’s incorrect statement that there existed “testimonial evidence that drugs were involved”…
-
Fortner v. State, 23 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…t counsel was ineffective in failing to file a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing error when the sentence imposed is not authorized by law is cognizable in a petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. See Agosto-Molina v. State, 933 So. 2d 26, 27-28 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Section 948.20, Florida Statutes (2006), authorizes drug offender probation for chronic drug abusers whose criminal conduct is a violation of sections 893.13(2)(a) or (6)(a), Florida Statutes (2006). Because Fortner was…
-
O'Leary v. State, 2 So. 3d 358 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)…to correct illegal sentence. The failure of appellate counsel to file a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing error constitutes a cognizable claim in a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Agosto-Molina v. State, 933 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Barber v. State, 918 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Horne v. State, 918 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Hakkenberg v. State, 889 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Gisi v. State, 848 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). To establish a cl…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Winyatta Butler v. State, 838 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 2003)
- Washington v. State, 814 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
- Hakkenberg v. State, 889 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
- Drayton v. State, 791 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
- Vrobel v. State, 884 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
- Ricci Schmidt v. State, 884 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)