GREGORY D. MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2006-05-12
No. 2D05-2520
SILBERMAN and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
933 So. 2d 42 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2006)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The appellate court affirmed the conviction but reversed and remanded the sentence to correct imposed costs and attorney fees.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of burglary. While his appeal was pending, he filed a motion to correct sentencing error regarding court costs and attorney fe…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Judge.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Gregory D. Moore appeals his conviction and sentence for burglary of a dwelling. We affirm his conviction; however, we reverse and remand his sentence for the circuit court to correct two imposed costs.

While his appeal was pending, Moore filed a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) on September 19, 2005. In his motion, Moore challenged his sentence and the imposition of two costs. He argued that the circuit court erred in imposing $650 in court costs, because the court pronounced court costs of only $450. Moore also argued that the circuit court erred in imposing $950 in attorney fees without offering him an opportunity to object to those fees.

The circuit court granted Moore’s motion on November 28, 2005. This order was untimely, because it was not entered within sixty days as required by rule 3.800(b)(2). Therefore, the circuit court’s order is a nullity and Moore’s motion is deemed denied. See Whitmore v. State, 910 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

On appeal, the State correctly concedes that the court costs should be reduced to $450 and that the $950 attorney fee assessment should be stricken. We therefore reverse and remand Moore’s sentence for the trial court to correct the assessment of these costs. His sentence is otherwise affirmed.

Accordingly, we affirm Moore’s conviction and reverse and remand his sentence for the trial court to reduce court costs to $450 and strike the attorney fee assessment.

Affirmed in part; reversed for the correction of court costs.

SILBERMAN and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw