STEPHEN MADDRIE, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES R. MCDONOUGH AND ARAMARK CORPORATION, APPELLEES
STEPHEN MADDRIE, APPELLANT,
JAMES R. MCDONOUGH AND ARAMARK CORPORATION, APPELLEES
933 So. 2d 579
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(£); Benton v. Moore, 655 So. 2d 1272, 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). In light of the dismissal of this appeal, all pending motions are denied as moot.
KAHN, C.J., ERVIN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Maddrie v. McDONOUGH, 945 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…for declaratory judgment. See, e.g., Henry v. Finta, 559 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Accordingly, Maddrie’s appeal of the order granting the motion for judgment on the pleadings was dismissed by this court as premature. See Maddrie v. McDonough, 933 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). By his present petition, Maddrie now seeks to compel the circuit court to render a final, appealable order. Under appropriate circumstances, the remedy of mandamus is available to compel a lower tribunal to render an appealabl…
Authorities Cited
- Benton v. Moore, 655 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)